After the merge of #125 and #124, the maintainer decided on 2026-10-19:
- Decision 21, "Closing the gate": rc8 is mandatory (master is ahead of rc7 by
the seven product files of #125, and stable is accepted through the last
prerelease); rc8 carries the fix of the false "no access" of
Get-NTFSEffectiveAccess, while the hard-link names under a root that is not
the volume root stay a known limit listed in the release notes; the plain
test gaps are closed in a tests-only round until 2026-11-02; the steps from
rc8 to the stable tag.
- Decision 22 accepted: all ten behavior changes of rc7, two of them breaking.
- Decision 23: option 3, a decision date of 2026-11-02; the gate for #34 stays
open, and no risk is accepted.
- Decision 24 accepted: the operating-system matrix as it is.
The decision index, the active context, and the progress file follow. The
oldest entries of the progress file are shortened to stay under the line
budget.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AI Assistant <ai@example.com>
The independent review of the acceptance record found no Blocker or Major
issue. This commit corrects what it found: the commit that fixed the break
row, what the State test shows, the baseline failures that carry no message,
the count of results, the wording about the folders before the first run, the
truncated messages in the results file, the README row of case 10, and the
review section of the record.
The 42 messageless baseline failures are now explained by a diagnostic that
runs the bodies of those tests in a TEMP sandbox: on the base, the second item
is removed, copied, moved, re-owned, or rewritten after Select-Object -First 1
or a throw; on the candidate it stays. The diagnostic, the check of the result
files, and a read-only check of a published version are in Tests/Lab/Acceptance.
Decision 22 no longer says that Copy-Item2 is like Copy-Item for a folder: the
built-in Copy-Item creates the missing parent folders of a folder copy,
Copy-Item2 of rc6 and of the candidate doesn't. The choice stays, the reference
point is corrected, and the question is left to the maintainer. The migration
hint of item 8 is stated as it is.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AI Assistant <ai@example.com>
The maintainer delegated open decisions to the agent on 2026-10-09 ("do it and
report about it later"). The agent checked the ten choices of Decision 22
against the source, the tests, the cmdlet pages, and the changelog, and
confirmed all of them. The record lists the impact for a caller and the
documentation of each choice, and says how to revert one. Its status stays
proposed until the maintainer confirms it.
The Memory Bank notes the repeated lab acceptance of the paths fixes and the
lesson about proving a fix with a baseline run.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AI Assistant <ai@example.com>
Decision 22 lists the ten choices for the behavior changes of Phase 2,
proposed for the maintainer's review, and the outcome of the review.
progress.md and activeContext.md record the branch, the suite, the lab
acceptance, and the next steps; systemPatterns.md adds patterns for
writing cmdlets.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AI Assistant <ai@example.com>
Raimund Andree