You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 

17 KiB

Acceptance of the published 5.0.0-rc8, 2026-10-20

Live and local acceptance of the exact prerelease that the PowerShell Gallery has, in the operating-system matrix and in the first lab. It repeats the acceptance of the published 5.0.0-rc7 with the bytes of rc8, which carries the module changes of the coverage work since rc7 and the fix of the swallowed initialization errors of Get-NTFSEffectiveAccess. This record doesn't repeat the machines, the defects, or the method of the earlier records; it adds what differs. It isn't a claim that the quality gate is complete (see the limits at the end).

Result

  • The published 5.0.0-rc8 passed every stage. The identity check (tag, CI run, Gallery hash, GitHub zip) passed before the runs. The live controller passed in the three cells of the matrix, both editions, every role: 1,374 passed, 0 failed, 12 skipped, and the independent end-state check of every cell said CLEAN. The module's own suite passed in all 24 runs (six machine classes, two editions, elevated and as a basic user), and every skipped test is also skipped on the host. The live controller passed in the first lab, where case 9 runs: 245 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped in each edition, and the independent checks found both labs clean after the run and again at the end.
  • The live counts equal those of the published rc7: 1,374 / 0 / 12 in the cells and 245 / 0 / 1 per edition in the first lab. The live tests and the controller are the same Git blobs as in that run, so the cells measure the changed module, not changed tests. The module's suite has 1,191 cases per configuration on the machines of the domain (rc7: 1,011), because the coverage work added tests.
  • The changes of the module since rc7 are listed below. The unit suites on six machine classes ran their tests; the live tests of Get-NTFSEffectiveAccess -ServerName (a computer that can't be reached, and a computer that refuses the user) passed unchanged in every cell.
  • On Windows Server 2019, 2022, and 2025 and on Windows 11 26H1, a computer name of 32,718 characters or more fails with error 14 and a shorter one with error 1722, the boundary that the CHANGELOG names for the new GetEffectiveAccessError (see "The long name of -ServerName").
  • The run changed nothing in the module, the tests, or the kit: it used the files of the tag.

What differs from the published rc7

The tag has 36 commits without merges after 5.0.0-rc7, most of them tests and documents. The module changed in nine C# files and in the manifest:

Change Files Commits
The AppliesTo property of a piped object binds for a path, and the scope of one piped object no longer reaches the next AddAccess.cs, RemoveAccess.cs, AddAudit.cs, RemoveAudit.cs 93ed2c7, 9783d2a
Get-ChildItem2 enumerates and filters without the culture of the thread (the filter missed files under tr-TR) GetChildItem2.cs 0028ccd, fbe0289, 8a625c8
An identity compares with a name without the culture of the thread IdentityReference2.cs 419cfb3
Get-NTFSEffectiveAccess writes a GetEffectiveAccessError when Windows refuses to start the authorization manager, and warns that the result is based on this computer only when it calculated one GetEffectiveAccess.cs, Lib.cs 25fe775
The prerelease label NTFSSecurity.psd1 e2e9324

No changed line writes or selects a section (owner, group, DACL, or SACL) of a security descriptor: the first three rows change how a parameter or a name is read, and the fourth changes only the read of the effective access.

Candidate and artifact identity

Test-PublishedRelease.ps1 -Version 5.0.0-rc8 ran at 10:42 UTC, before the runs, and printed PUBLISHED_IDENTITY_VERIFIED. It changes nothing on GitHub or in the Gallery.

Published 5.0.0-rc8
Tag 5.0.0-rc8, commit c71919700c3fc48ac910f86f94f59ab2f5731add, on master (the merge of #127)
CI run of the tag 39408140862 (started 10:28:05 UTC): Build and test and Release succeeded
PowerShell Gallery published 10:40:58 UTC; the SHA-512 that the Gallery publishes matches the downloaded package
GitHub prerelease published 10:41:07 UTC
NTFSSecurity.5.0.0-rc8.nupkg SHA-256 EA90E16F2152016E97BFB3D2413D29F8944704E9D4FBD5101D0A263841BC0510
NTFSSecurity.zip SHA-256 288152E20F8CFB1B029BAC055345339970C65BD57C8BA814C2616C32D9F812BC
NTFSSecurity.dll SHA-256 D8CB4015BF25379C77A645F82EEECA54F86219F228A5029E32E4D52FBD016E79
Manifest 5.0.0 with Prerelease = 'rc8'

The 11 module files of the nupkg and of the zip are byte for byte equal (the hashes). The controller checks the SHA-512 that the Gallery publishes before it runs a package, and it kept the package that it downloaded in each of its five runs (the three cells and the two editions of the first lab): all five nupkg files and all five DLLs equal the values above. The suites staged the extracted zip, and their logs record the same DLL hash on all six machine classes. The build isn't byte-reproducible, so these hashes belong to this one build.

Method

The method of the records of the matrix and of the published rc7 applies. What differs:

  • Frozen kit. The kit, the controller, and the live tests are the files of the tag, in an isolated worktree, so that no change of the working tree could affect a run in progress. The live tests are the Git blob efe36e5073b9b10742ca7de242ddcbe90d8eda62 and the controller the blob 635bf162421b4df4efc76d5677212e8782e8bf77, the same as in the acceptance of the published rc7.
  • Machines from the saved state. Every machine of both labs had been saved since 2026-10-11 14:17 UTC. A script restored them in waves (the domain controllers first, then the other domain controllers and the certification authority, then the file servers and clients), and the readiness check of both labs passed at its first attempt (10:43 UTC, clock skew 4 to 5 seconds). The evaluation client OSWin11E started at 10:43:41 UTC, because it shuts itself down an hour after each start. After the run, the machines were saved again, as they were found.
  • Order. One detached driver ran the stages in this order: the identity check, the readiness of both labs, the three cells of the matrix, the module's suite on six machine classes, the check of what the suites left in the matrix lab, and the first lab. The driver only calls the scripts of the kit and a few helper scripts (see the evidence).
  • Live controller. Run-MatrixSequence.ps1 -Version 5.0.0-rc8 -FileServer OSFile19,OSFile22,OSFile25, with the client OSWin11E: the readiness of every machine, the controller in both editions, Validate-LabResults.ps1 for every role from the result files (-Expect Candidate), a snapshot of the fixture SIDs, -RemoveFixture, and Test-MatrixCleanup.ps1. In the first lab the same stages ran with the foreign domain controllers of case 9, with -Version for each edition in its own run.
  • Suite. Run-MatrixLocalSuite.ps1 -ModulePath with the extracted zip, -Mode Elevated,Basic, both editions, on OSWin11E, OSFile19, OSFile22, OSFile25, OSWin11 (with the local installation account), and the host as the reference. The processes started 75 seconds apart, because AutomatedLab imports one lab at a time.
  • No checkpoint. The procedure in the README takes a checkpoint of the machines before a run. This run took none: the machines were restored from their saved state, and the end state of every cell was verified instead.

Results

Live controller in the matrix

The Windows 11 client OSWin11E with each file server, one sequence (rc8), 10:47 to 11:08 UTC. Every role was checked from the result files, and Validate-LabResults.ps1 printed LIVE_RESULT_VERIFIED (Candidate) for each cell. The counts are the same in both editions and in all three cells (Cells.csv):

Role Passed / failed / skipped
Delegate 69 / 0 / 0
ServerAdmin 36 / 0 / 0
Admin 51 / 0 / 1
Server 73 / 0 / 1

That is 229 passed, 0 failed, and 2 skipped per edition and cell, and 1,374 passed, 0 failed, 12 skipped for the three cells. The skipped tests are those of the earlier records: case 9 (the matrix lab has no foreign domain) and the test of the module version in the Server role (that role runs without the module).

File server Cell Controller End-state check
OSFile19 (Windows Server 2019) 10:47:42 to 10:53:53 10:48:10 to 10:52:54 CLEAN
OSFile22 (Windows Server 2022) 10:53:53 to 10:59:45 10:54:16 to 10:58:54 CLEAN
OSFile25 (Windows Server 2025) 10:59:45 to 11:08:42 11:00:08 to 11:07:51 CLEAN

First lab (case 9)

WindowsAccessControlLab, both editions, 11:26 to 11:46 UTC: the domain controller F1ADC1, the file server F1AFile2, and the client F1AFile1 (domain a.forest1.net), with the foreign domain controllers F1BDC1, F2DC1, and F3DC1. Validate-LabResults.ps1 printed LIVE_RESULT_VERIFIED (Candidate) for each edition. The counts are the same in both editions (FirstLab.csv):

Role Passed / failed / skipped
Delegate 69 / 0 / 0
ServerAdmin 36 / 0 / 0
Admin 64 / 0 / 0
Server 76 / 0 / 1

That is 245 passed, 0 failed, and 1 skipped per edition; the skipped test is the test of the module version in the Server role. The Windows PowerShell run took 11:27 to 11:36 UTC and the PowerShell 7 run 11:36 to 11:44 UTC. The fixture was removed with -RemoveFixture, and the independent check found the four domains and both machines clean: no organizational unit, account, share, folder, local group, membership, or profile of the fixture, and none of the residue that the check counts. Its verdict was CLEAN (11:45 UTC). The final read-only check of both labs after the whole run said CLEAN for the matrix lab (11:46 UTC) and for the first lab (11:46 UTC).

The module's own suite

Passed / failed / skipped. Every configuration has 1,191 cases on the machines of the domain and on OSWin11, and 1,190 on the host, which has no DNS domain, so the test of the fully qualified name of this computer doesn't exist there (LocalSuite.csv).

Machine Elevated, Windows PowerShell Elevated, PowerShell 7 Basic user, Windows PowerShell Basic user, PowerShell 7
OSFile19 (Server 2019) 1,172 / 0 / 19 1,170 / 0 / 21 907 / 0 / 284 905 / 0 / 286
OSFile22 (Server 2022) 1,172 / 0 / 19 1,170 / 0 / 21 907 / 0 / 284 905 / 0 / 286
OSFile25 (Server 2025) 1,172 / 0 / 19 1,170 / 0 / 21 907 / 0 / 284 905 / 0 / 286
OSWin11E (Windows 11 22H2) 1,172 / 0 / 19 1,170 / 0 / 21 907 / 0 / 284 905 / 0 / 286
OSWin11 (Windows 11 26H1) 1,172 / 0 / 19 1,170 / 0 / 21 907 / 0 / 284 905 / 0 / 286
Host (reference) 1,171 / 0 / 19 1,169 / 0 / 21 906 / 0 / 284 904 / 0 / 286

In all 20 comparisons with the host, the skipped tests are the same, name for name, as multisets (Export-MatrixResults.ps1 found no difference). No run has a failed test, a failed container, or a test that didn't run. The operating system builds are those of the readiness checks (Windows Server 2019 17763.1217, 2022 20348.4773, and 2025 26100.32690 on the domain controller and the file servers; Windows 11 22H2 22621.525 and 26H1 28000); the host has PowerShell 7.6.7, the virtual machines 7.6.3.

After the suites, Test-MatrixCleanup.ps1 -Mode Verify checked the domain and the machines OSFile19, OSFile22, OSFile25, and OSWin11E again (11:26 UTC): CLEAN at the first check, so no repair was needed. A read-only script checked OSWin11 with its local account (11:26 UTC): no scheduled task, stage item, probe user, profile, share, folder, or live user.

The long name of -ServerName

The CHANGELOG says that Get-NTFSEffectiveAccess now writes a GetEffectiveAccessError for a computer name of 32,718 characters or more, because Windows refuses to start the authorization manager for it. A probe with the call and the structure of Security2\Win32\Lib.cs (AuthzInitializeRemoteResourceManager), run on the machines of the matrix lab after the acceptance, shows the same boundary on every one of them:

Machine Operating system 1 to 32,717 characters 32,718 characters and more (also 32,768 and 70,000)
OSFile19 Windows Server 2019 Datacenter 10.0.17763 1722 (RPC server unavailable) 14
OSFile22 Windows Server 2022 Datacenter 10.0.20348 1722 14
OSFile25 Windows Server 2025 Datacenter 10.0.26100 1722 14
OSWin11 Windows 11 Pro 10.0.28000 1722 14

The probed lengths were 1, 255, 16,000, 32,717, 32,718, 32,768, and 70,000. On the host (Windows Server 2025), a bisection in both editions found the same boundary. Error 1722 keeps the fallback to this computer with its warning, and error 14 is the new error, so the regression test of the fix, which accepts either outcome, takes its error branch on each of these systems. OSWin11E was off when the probe ran and wasn't probed.

Limits and open items

  • This is one run of one binary. A changed binary needs the same cells again; results of different binaries don't combine into one matrix. A stable 5.0.0 is a new build, because its manifest has no Prerelease value, so the identity of the tested bytes doesn't carry over to it. The release procedure (Docs/Contributing/05-Releasing.md) accepts the last prerelease instead; that is the maintainer's decision, not this record's.
  • Case 9 (accounts of other domains and forests) needs trusts that the matrix lab doesn't have, so the cells skip it, and it ran only in the first lab, on Windows Server 2025. The first lab has no other operating system.
  • Windows 11 26H1 has no live cell: its secure channel to the Windows Server 2025 domain controller of the lab fails, so it runs the suite only. The client of the cells is the Windows 11 22H2 evaluation build.
  • The file servers are Windows. A server of another kind is the subject of Decision 23 (issue #34) and wasn't tested.
  • The matrix and its decision (Decision 24) are the maintainer's. This record is the acceptance of the published rc8 on that matrix; whether the matrix is the right one, and whether the gate is closed, are the maintainer's decisions.
  • Test-MatrixCleanup.ps1 can't reach OSWin11 with the domain account. The read-only script that checked it with the local account is a helper of this run (see the evidence), not a script of the kit.
  • OSWin11E shut itself down by itself after the run, as it does an hour after every start (it was off at 11:51 UTC), and was left off. All the other machines of both labs were saved again at 11:52 to 11:53 UTC; neither lab has a fixture.
  • Of the two LOW findings of the security review in the record of the matrix, the swallowed initialization exceptions of GetEffectiveAccess are fixed in this build (#127). The ACL of the staging folders under C:\ is unchanged and wasn't part of this run.
  • The effective-access state that outlives a re-created account name wasn't investigated again; the three cells of one sequence are no test of it. The failures that the earlier record traced to it didn't recur.

Evidence

The raw logs, result files, the downloaded packages, and the driver are local, outside Git, in the session files of the run (the folder rc8-published). evidence-manifest.csv there lists the size and the SHA-256 of every file except itself and the worktree of the tag, which holds the files of the commit that Git has. The helper scripts of the run are in the folder scripts next to it: the driver (Chain-Published.ps1), the restore of the machines (Start-LabMachines.ps1), the first-lab run with -Version (Run-LiveAcceptancePublished.ps1), the check of OSWin11 (Verify-Client.ps1), and the exporter of the tables of this record (Build-RecordTables.ps1); the probe of the long name is p-authz-init-lab.ps1 in probes. The tables of this record are next to it:

The scripts of the kit that ran are in Acceptance; the decision is .memory-bank\decisions\0024-os-matrix-lab.md.